An STO Lifecycle: The Complete List of Milestones

How to issue a digital security, what are the steps: a brief outline of the 12 stages that a company will take to launch an STO complying with all the legal issues

We intentionally skip the zero stage: the decision to take the very STO as a way of raising funds and focus only on practical steps.

This is neither a call for action nor a 100%-safe guide. One must do their own research to make conscious choices and deliberate decisions. Finrazor itself does not support any project, company or method of fund-raising in particular.

1. Business model analysis

… to make the decision what type of securities to issue for attracting investments.

This stage is about finding the best instrument to attract investments to the company. Common questions are raised, like when is it coming to financing; debt or equity?

Let’s assume that STO suits you. Then, the IB or financial specialists identify what type of securities could be suitable according to its business model. Common shares that represent a share of equity, debt instruments as bonds or preferred shares considered as hybrid instruments of debt and equity financing.

So, first, it’s important to understand the company’s market capitalization and develop a clear vision of a financial plan to decide what are the amounts to be attracted at a current round.

2. Legal body incorporation and a bank account

Investors need to be sure in the investing for the securities into a real company. There are common options as Simple Agreement on Future Equity that promise shares after legal body incorporation. However, it’s applicable only for startups on usually pre-seed rounds and issue of digital securities is different.

There is a myth that STO is available only in the US, but this is not true. However, the process there is a bit more well-defined. Legal body in the US jurisdiction guarantees the US investors their rights according to the local legislation they used to work with. It means that one may have more chances to attract investments from the US investors into a US-incorporated company.

It takes approximately two weeks to open a bank account — to make it possible to receive the fund. In part, SVB and Silvergate banks seem to be welcoming various businesses to expand their own presence in crypto/blockchain enterprises as well.

3. Structuring of the Agreements with the investors

This is definitely the vital task, in terms of the balance of interests between parties and risks mitigation.

The legal and economy specification must outline the rights of investors and your security offering details. For instance, it should contain:

  • the date of Digital Security emission,
  • the rules of their circulation,
  • how the distribution of dividends is to be conducted,
  • when the company will make reports to Financial Regulators and Tax authorities.

All this plays a big role in the investors’ decision and will be outlined in the agreements.

4. Filing with the regulator

Each jurisdiction has its own rules of compliance when issuing a security. General rules require filing the S-1 prospectus.

This might be a complicated process. For instance, in the US there are exemptions when it’s not necessary to approve the prospectus with the SEC. The most common exemption is under the Regulation D applicable for the US investors. To qualify for limited offering exemption under the regulation D the securities should be offered to accredited investors only under the rule 506(c), and the company has to take reasonable steps to verify the status of the investors, so KYC and using the accreditation soft on your website when attracting the investments would be a benefit for optimizing the process for both parties.

There is also a chance to accept non-accredited investors under the Regulation D rule 506(b), without promoting the token (general solicitation) and offering the security to the investors that are known to the issuer prior to offering process. Practically it’s the family, friends or angels that backed up the project from the beginning and can not exceed the number of 35 investors.

Also, Regulation S is applicable for non-US investors and Reg CF for crowdfunding the amounts of no more than $1 million. You will also draft a Private Placement Memorandum, a definitive narrative of the offering outlining the benefits and risks of a venture, which is a key document for accredited investors. Risks and disclaimers shall be described widely to protect the company from the investor's potential claims. You will need to prepare all filing-related documents, including Operating Agreement/Shareholders Agreement, Subscription Agreement, Investors Questionnaires, and Blue Sky Notice filing.

5. Smart Contract development and token creation

All the terms and conditions of a tokensale outlined in the specification shall be implemented in the smart contact. The token itself represents a security, so all the requirements as restricted selling (i.e., the lock-up period) need to be set in the smart-contract.

The smart contracts logic settlement and choosing a token standard is a challenge with legal rules ‘incorporated’ into the code. That’s exactly where lawyers and tech specialists should work together. There are some solutions that allow the lock-up periods, whitelisting of Reg D and Reg S investors and restricting trades between each other and other features to make the token’s circulation compliant.

You can try some platforms — like Securitize, Polymath, Harbor, Astos — to issue the token.

6. Settling the dashboard to investors on-boarding

The dashboard is some soft that helps you to accept the investments, with KYC/AML and accreditation. White Label solutions settled and customized on your website make it easier to invest in your company using crypto or fiat transactions.

7. Starting out a marketing campaign

‘Security’-marketing is quite different than it was in the ICO world. We all watched the case with Floyd Mayweather and DJ Khaled — these pop-stars were fined for the promotion of a security without a license. The fines are twice bigger than the received payments under the marketing agreement.

Product description and meetups about its development and usage won’t fall under the ‘licensed activity’, however, an offer or direct promotion of a security for sale must do the issuer herself or licensed broker-dealers only.

8. Accreditation and Verification (KYC/AML processes)

After the marketing campaign and receiving some commitments, it becomes necessary to check the investors’ status.

The accreditation is required when the investor can’t provide a legal opinion or W-2 statement to prove her status. An accredited investor is considered such when she possesses assets to total no less than $1 mln or has personal income no less than $200k annually or $300k for a household for the recent 2 years, and has expectations to maintain such an income.

Talking about the assets amount required to qualify for accreditation, almost all property considered as an asset, even an old wine bottle or an old car can help one to reach the required 1 mln. Directors, Executive officers, and General Partners are also considered as accredited investors.

As a company attracting investments, you need to verify this status via KYCprocess. You check the investor’s proof of the status by investigating their attached documents or by the results of the verification company that can be used for that purpose.

Verify Investors, etc. may be handy here.

9. Receiving funds

When an investor is checked, she can transfer the funds to your business bank account or make a crypto transaction.

10. Distribution of the digital securities

After receiving the funds, you — as a company — shall deliver the tokens (digital securities) to the investors to their whitelisted (via KYC) wallets.

11. Listing on the secondary market

As for today, only Open Finance started to trade digital securities (as a specifically designed product) on their exchanges and a few more exchanges to be launched soon.

The listing procedure on such an exchange differs from public listing on traditional exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange, and requires internal compliance procedures. Namely, a legal documents provision, protocol security audit etc, that would mitigate the risks for the exchange when dealing with the asset.

12. Capitalization table management

All the processes are handled, investors holding your tokens and trading on the exchange after the lock-up period expiration — and the management of the ledger where all the data of current investors is the next challenge.

Distribution of the dividends, creating the new tokens and distributing when the owner lost its private keys and other processes would fall under the cap table management. There are enterprise-grade software vendors in the space, making all procedures easily trackable and deliverable.

In collaboration with Zufar G., the VP of business development at Astos: full lifecycle management company for digital securities offering

Related news

Thai Cryptocurrency Exchange Determined to Stay Open After SEC Orders Shutdown

The Thai Ministry of Finance has rejected the last cryptocurrency exchange application it had been reviewing. The exchange, which has been ordered to close down business and return customer funds, is determined to stay operational. “Shutting down is not an option for us,” its chief strategy officer reportedly said. Also read: Indian Supreme Court Moves Crypto Hearing, Community Calls for Positive Regulations Coin Asset Exchange Rejected The Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced on Monday the outcome of the latest cryptocurrency exchange application it had been reviewing. The country’s Ministry of Finance, under the recommendation of the SEC board, decided to reject the application of Coin Asset Co. Ltd. to operate a crypto exchange. The company has been allowed to operate in Thailand while its application was being reviewed. However, the SEC has notified the company of its rejection and ordered it to cease operations by Jan. 21. The regulator told the exchange’s CEO, Sivanus Yamdee, that the minimum processing time is four months should the exchange reapply for a license, the Bangkok Post reported on Wednesday. Yamdee said his company will meet with the SEC on Friday to discuss continuing crypto operations. The news outlet further quoted him as saying: We are seeking a way to keep our digital asset exchange operating as the business cycle is moving towards a peak … We are unable to endure such as long processing time. The business cycle is on the rise and there are costs for conducting daily business. It is not easy to maintain customer loyalty. With about 10,000 customers, the exchange’s 24-hour trading volume is approximately 91 million baht (~$2.87 million) at the time of this writing. In August last year, the exchange unveiled its own line of cryptocurrency automated teller machines (ATMs). It also lists Jfin coin, the country’s first initial coin offering launched by a subsidiary of a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand, Jay Mart Plc. Coin Asset’s new chief strategy officer, Arnon Saksri, was quoted by the Bangkok Post as saying: Ultimately, we want to be regulated … It will improve investor confidence and the legitimacy of our cryptocurrency businesses, but the SEC has to find the right way to do it … Shutting down is not an option for us. The Thai Ministry of Finance issued licenses to four cryptocurrency businesses on Jan. 8, three of which are exchanges and one is a broker-dealer. Reason for Denial According to the statement by the Thai SEC, the finance ministry cited “a major change to the company’s management … [which] affected the readiness of the company’s important work systems” as the reason for rejecting Coin Asset’s application. The commission detailed that “three out of four directors responsible for the [exchange’s] important work systems resigned.” The ministry elaborated: The company failed to meet the standards on work systems. For example, the systems for custody of client assets and know your customer (KYC) were inconsistent with the standards accepted by the [Thai] Anti-Money Laundering Office. The exchange maintains that its security system is safe, noting that it complies with ISO/IEC 27001:2013 international standard, Prachachat Turakij publication reported on Tuesday. Coin Asset added that its KYC process is linked to Thai banks, with comprehensive anti-money laundering measures. The finance ministry has allowed the company to keep operating until Jan. 21 “to ensure proper proceeding of related matters including notification to the clients regarding asset refunds or asset transfers to other digital asset operators according to the clients’ order,” the SEC emphasized. “Regarding clients’ assets under custody, the company is requested to transfer or return the assets according to the clients’ order and report the results of the matter to the SEC.” Following the commission’s announcement, Coin Asset informed its customers that they can continue to trade until Jan. 21 and have until Feb. 14 to withdraw funds. Do you think the Thai SEC will let Coin Asset remain open? Let us know in the comments section below. Images courtesy of Shutterstock and the Thai SEC. Need to calculate your bitcoin holdings? Check our tools section. The post Thai Cryptocurrency Exchange Determined to Stay Open After SEC Orders Shutdown appeared first on Bitcoin News.
Bitcoin News

Ukrainian nationals charged with hacking SEC docs in $4.1 million scam

The Department of Justice has charged two Ukrainian nationals for hacking into the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) computer system to steal confidential corporate information and sell it to the highest bidder or to make trades. Artem Radchenko and Oleksandr Ieremenko were charged in the United States Court District of New Jersey with securities fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy, computer fraud conspiracy, wire fraud, and computer fraud. These illegal endeavors are part of an earlier scheme that saw Ieremenko and others charged with allegedly illegally obtaining corporate press releases prior to their general release and using the information to make trades, the DOJ said in a statement. Ieremenko remains at large in the Ukraine. The operation ran from about May 3, 2016 until October 20, 2016. Overall, the conspiracy is believed to have earned the defendants a total of $4.1 million. The latest charges stem from Ieremenko and Radchenko’s hacking of the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) system. EDGAR is used by corporations to hold non-public confidential information, conduct test filings, performs automated collection, validation, indexing, acceptance, and forwarding of submissions by companies and others who are required by law to file forms with the SEC. The others named in the civil suit associated with this case are: David Kwon, Sungjin Cho, Igor Sabodakha, Victoria Vorochek, Andrey Sarafanov, Ivan Olefir, Capyield Systems, Ltd. (owned by Olefir) and Spirit Trade Ltd., according to court documents. These people and entities were part of a network of securities traders located in the United States, Ukraine, and Russia, who received the hacked material nonpublic information, directly or indirectly, from Ieremenko, a court filing stated. The DOJ claims that the duo allegedly hacked into EDGAR and stole thousands of files, including annual and quarterly earnings reports containing confidential, non-public and general financial information. The court filing stated the trader defendants then monetized the information by purchasing or selling short the relevant securities and profiting from the market reaction once the information was disseminated to the public. The trader defendants then, directly or indirectly, kicked back a portion of the resulting trading profits to Ieremenko. “The defendants allegedly orchestrated sophisticated computer intrusions to steal non-public information from the SEC, compromising the integrity of the market and depriving honest investors of a level playing field,” said Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski. In a statement the DOJ detailed a few of the incidents. In one case a test filing for a company was uploaded to EDGAR at 3:32 p.m. on May 19, 2016. Within six minutes the defendants allegedly stole the test filing, sent a copy to a server in Lithuania and then between 3:42 p.m. and 3:59 p.m. a co-conspirator bought $2.4 million shares of the company. The test filing as then officially released a few minutes after 4 p.m. releasing the news, the firm’s second quarter financial report, which stated it expected to deliver record earnings. The stock rose on the news and the conspirator then sold the stock making $270,000. To obtain access to EDGAR Ieremenko hacked his way passed EDGAR’s login, then misrepresented himself as an authorized EDGAR filer and accessed the non-public filings. He acquired this level of access through a phishing campaign where he posed as an SEC security person and emailed other SEC personnel and convinced them to open malicious documents that downloaded malware into the SEC system. The wire fraud conspiracy and substantive wire fraud counts with which the defendants are charged carry a maximum potential penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, or twice the gain or loss from the offense. The securities fraud conspiracy, computer fraud conspiracy, and substantive computer fraud counts with which the defendants are charged carry a maximum potential penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine, or twice the gain or loss from the offense.  The post Ukrainian nationals charged with hacking SEC docs in $4.1 million scam appeared first on SC Media.
SC Media

Winklevoss Twins Believe the SEC is Waiting for More Market Surveillance and Protections

According to Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, the popular twins in the cryptocurrency world and founders of the Gemini exchange, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is searching for more market surveillance and protections. During an interview with Fortune Ledger, they talked about the SEC and the different concerns it has about the crypto market. Furthermore, they talked about the Bitcoin ETF and cryptocurrencies. Back in July 2018, the SEC rejected the approval of a proposed rule change that was made by the Winklevoss brothers. According to the regulatory agency of the United States, there were some issues related to market manipulation and the lack of market surveillance. In this way, the SEC rejected two different Bitcoin ETF proposals made by the twins. Nevertheless, SEC’s commissioner Hester Peirce, which is a supporter of virtual currencies, commented negatively about the decision taken by the regulatory agency. She mentioned that the proposed rule change had all the pre-requisites for the approval of this specific rule change. After this, Gemini decided to partner with Nasdaq and have their market surveillance services at the exchange. Although in February the SEC has to take a final decision regarding the ETF proposal presented by VanEck and SolidX, Cameron believes that is hard to predict when the approval will happen. He mentioned that they have been working for six years to have a Bitcoin ETF approved and that they will continue working in the future for it to happen. Cameron commented about it: “We understand the commission’s concerns. We’ve heard them loud and clear and they are basically calling for more market surveillance and protections in the marketplace to avoid, prevent against manipulative behaviour and stuff like that. So, Gemini has built a market surveillance team.” Additionally, he went on saying that their crypto exchange is working on the Virtual Commodity Association, a self-regulatory organization in the United States related to the crypto world. The intention is to have similar standards in the industry and build integrity in the market. Cameron explained that they understand the decision taken by the SEC since these will be the first products related to cryptocurrencies. It is very important for companies to work in order to help this process and be compliant with all the requirements needed. The Winklevoss brothers have also a different perspective regarding regulations in the cryptocurrency world. They believe that with regulations it is possible to open new accounts and start new companies in the space. In general, the BitLicense given by regulators in New York seems to be very difficult to be acquired. There are several enthusiasts and crypto experts that have criticized this decision to impose these regulations in the space. However, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss believe that regulation has been a big win for New York State. Additionally, they’ve mentioned that Gemini is trying to take the best protection measures and bring them into the crypto industry.
Bitcoin Exchange Guide

Hot news

By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies. Read Privacy Policy to know more or withdraw your consent.