Crypto Funds Stopped Growing Like Trees As The Bulls Are Not Grazing There Anymore

Crypto Funds Stopped Growing Like Trees As The Bulls Are Not Grazing There Anymore

In 2017 the market was growing very fast, and cryptocurrency funds showed good results, but 2018 doesn't pay off. Pantera Capital’s crypto fund lost 72.7% of its value in 2018. Since its launch, the fund lost 40.8% of its value

Seems like all of us are in the same boat, it doesn't matter how big you are, because it's not 2017. In 2017 the market was growing on steroids, and it doesn't matter in retrospective, what caused this growth. The most important is that everybody suddenly became genius investors, young Buffets, and if you're a genius, it should be considered a crime not to sell your state-of-art skills of investing to ordinary peasants. Some of the new crypto investors with a spark of an entrepreneur inside created Telegram channels, the most gifted of them created Telegram channels with trading signals, all other crypto predators were fine with the leftovers, so they created crypto funds.

We can’t blame them for that. They really believed in their superiority. If you read everywhere that 20% per annum is a really good result, and you get a 1,000% profit, you start thinking that you’re some kind of a trading god. Most people on crypto market were the newbies, seeking help from gurus. People who bought in earlier made a small fortune, so they were regarded as gurus.

There a good explanation of this psychology from Alexander Elder:

The public wants gurus, and new gurus will come...A new market cycle guru emerges in almost every major stock market cycle, once every 4 years. A guru's fame tends to last for 2 to 3 years. The reigning period of each guru coincides with a major bull market in the United States. At some point, the market changes and starts marching to a different tune. A guru continues to use old methods that worked spectacularly well in the past and rapidly loses his following. When the guru's forecasts stop working, public admiration turns to hatred.

Alexander Elder, professional trader

Does it remind you anyone? Oh, yes, it's Michael Novogratz, who tries to guess the bottom every week. We'll return to him a bit later.

It was 2017, crypto funds, showing extraordinary profits, were growing like trees in the forest. After a while, seasoned professionals also decided to join the party. Officially, in the summer of 2017 there were only 57 crypto funds, a year later, in the summer, there were a lot more — 225 funds. Some of them were founded by successful hedge funds with their own analysts and a lot of resources. Still, they show that they don't know anything special about crypto, showing the same losses, as the whole market in general. They followed this buy'n'hold strategy that works well in a bull market when you can buy anything and you'll get a profit eventually. Currently, the problem is in the market. The bulls are gone.

Pantera Capital are the smart guys. When we gossip about their 40% losses, we should not forget that we talk only about the new fund, that buys altcoins. Their oldest fund, founded 6 years ago, gave a 10,000% return on investments to its investors. That's a pretty good result. Also, let's point out that they started to invest before the hype when the bubble was relatively small. Now the bubble burst, but it doesn't mean that it can't grow even bigger after that. Most altcoins will die — many of them don't have any inner value, their token economy doesn't work and these projects were created only to grab some money by slapping 'blockchain' on them. However, some of these coins can have a bright future, the problem is to guess the right ones. Pantera Capital buys for a long hold, so they shouldn't care about paper losses. Eventually, all coins that won't die until the next bull will surge again, so let's not draw conclusions until the next year.

Many other funds show the similar dynamic. I've already mentioned Mike Novogratz. He's a billionaire, that's enough to describe him. However, we should not ignore the fact that for some reason he continues to make ridiculous statements, calling bottom at all possible levels, talking about $100,000 per Bitcoin by the end of the next year, when he feels extra bullish, and changing his prediction a week later after one-two big red candles (I think somebody should draw a chart of his predictions at the end of 2018, it's a pity I'm too lazy for this). Anyway, his Galaxy Digital Assets fund reported a loss of $134 million, showing that even billionaires can be wrong sometimes. Or many times.

The year 2017 was a magnificent year for pretty much everyone, except for the most greedy ones. But the blessed times of brainless growth seem to be over. It's very unlikely that big guys with bottomless pockets will take all this crowd up to the moon. Everyone has to choose wisely from now on - the next bull run will top the previous heights, and increase the capitalization of the crypto market, but not for all coins, and it will also end, nothing can grow endlessly. The good fund should know how to make money in good market conditions and also in bad market conditions. If it shows the same dynamic as an ordinary retail investor, it's pointless to invest in this fund. So let's suppose this is the point where everyone starts to realize that crypto market has two directions and starts to apply risk management to his investment portfolio — and then we'll never see such news again.


8,744 USD -0.58%
Volume, 24h
3,497,717,274 USD
153,922,072,217 USD

Related news

Bitcoin mining pools Poolin and compete for the position of dominant mining pool

Founded in 2015,, a mining pool owned by Bitmain is one of the largest in the world. has dominated the mining pool and had retained its dominance through the first and second quarter of 2019. The mining pool was holding a 15.42% share of the total hash rate in Q1 and a 19.86% […] The post Bitcoin mining pools Poolin and compete for the position of dominant mining pool appeared first on AMBCrypto.

Episode #427 Bitcoin To $40,000 This Fall?

We pass along some comments from a top cryptocurrency trader. Plus, the Tiki God Pilau Lolo is back!! Follow Us: Join Us: BTC:16aSJUYcGRLixKeeSoUpzkGdcNZhigWHy1 LTC: LaAcZvAgHeFH7eWKjZZ7fweKicWsBZELbH ETH: 0xBB843a08F639A1831eEA2Ec76Accb76d661411c0 BCH: qqv3j4qxs9t6n5qdh9lcf9wlhet3mkw3f5rma7pvqy
Crypto Viewing

How Much BTC Do You Need to Be a Bitcoin Whale?

So you wanna be a Bitcoin whale? The amount of BTC you need to influence the markets in the future could be drastically smaller than today. A Bitcoin Whale Moves $1Bn (94,504 BTC) 10 days ago, a Bitcoin whale (yes, the mother of all Bitcoin whales) moved $1 billion of BTC in just one transaction. Understandably, that amount of bitcoin on the move from the largest non-exchange address triggered a wave of speculation–from Bakkt warehousing to a massive incoming dump. Whatever the reasons, you have to admit, moving that much money in one whale tail swipe is pretty awesome… And a little bit scary. Ummmm that’s a billion dollars. — Houden (@BitHouden) September 6, 2019 Bitcoin whales have the power to move the markets. As per research conducted by Diar this time last year, more than 55% of the world’s circulating supply of Bitcoin was controlled by less than 1% of all BTC wallets. That means that a very small amount of people have a very large influence on what happens to BTC’s price. But as one user pointed out on Reddit earlier, the number of bitcoins needed to be a BTC whale may change significantly over time. How Many Bitcoins Make a Whale? The Reddit user wrote: 10 years ago if you had 10,000 Bitcoin you’re not a whale. You’re merely a pizza eater. Today I believe hodling 1,000 BTC (maybe even less?) would make you a whale. Is there a future ahead where 100 BTC qualifies you as a whale? 10 BTC? Even one single coin? It’s certainly an interesting question which, naturally, sparked a host of interesting answers. Some people believe that, in the future, to be a Bitcoin whale, you’ll only need to own 0.28 BTC. Others disagreed, arguing that you’ll still need around the same amount as now. — Zaina (@Zaina87348021) September 6, 2019 Why? Because the ability to move the market has “nothing to do” with the USD value but the percentage of the total supply you have. This may not be the case, however, according to some. After all, they argue that your ability to influence the market is not relative to how much BTC you hold but “the total amount of available liquidity on the markets.” This means that as more individuals hold bitcoin, there will be less liquidity and smaller amounts of BTC will yield more influence. The Community Is Undecided It seems that the Bitcoin community doesn’t have a clear answer to the Redditor’s question of how much BTC you’ll need to be a Bitcoin whale in the future. The debate raged on inconclusively with others pointing out that, while 10K BTC may make a movement if you moved it all; you would cease to be a whale immediately after. Moreover, while 1 BTC may be extremely valuable in the future, it will never have the power to move the market since 1/21,000,000 is basically “peanuts.” How many bitcoins will one need to have to become a whale? In the future? Share your thoughts in the comments below.  Images via Bitcoinist Image Library, Twitter: @whale_alert  The post How Much BTC Do You Need to Be a Bitcoin Whale? appeared first on

Hot news

By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies. Read Privacy Policy to know more or withdraw your consent.