Limitations and Issues of Blockchain

Current issues and limitations of the blockchain technology in terms of scaling, privacy, storage, security and consensus

We have already talked about advantages of blockchain and what is is used for, however, the question of its disadvantages is still open. In this article we'll provide an overview over the key problems and limitations of blockchain.

Blockchains are the new way of establishing decentralized trustless communication and interaction, and their potential is far from being fully explored. However, they are not perfect. They have their inherent limitations and issues that we have yet to find solutions for.

Scaling

Public blockchains, such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, need their every node to verify each transaction. This explains the overall slow processing of transactions and leads to occasional bottlenecks in the system. Relative to other common payment systems, cryptocurrencies are at a big disadvantage. Bitcoin, for example, can process as few as seven transactions per second, which is not at all comparable to Visa, Mastercard, and Paypal standards. There are, however, various solutions proposed and being implemented to address scalability issues, such SegWit, second-layer protocols, and blockchain sharding.

Privacy

It may seem as though public blockchains are private in a sense that no real identity is tied to an address. However, the transaction history of each address is entirely open for public examination. Thus, it is not at all impossible that someone can observe transactional patterns and link your identity to the address. Some cryptocurrencies, such as Monero and zCash, offer privacy by using stealth addresses, ring signatures, and zero-knowledge cryptography.

Storage

Another inherent limitation of blockchains is storage constraints. Most blockchain networks require their full nodes to have the entire history of transactions on their computers. And it has to be always up to date in order for the node to be able to verify new transactions. So if you want to become a full bitcoin node, you will have to have at least 165 Gb (as of July 2018) of space on your disk. And as blockchains grow, it is only going to be harder for regular people to participate. Hopefully, it is only a matter of time until we come up with a solution, which does not destroy the whole principle of decentralized control.

Security

No central point of failure proves to be the blockchain’s advantage over server-client architectures. However, blockchains are not without their own security flaws, such as the 51% attack. The truth in a blockchain network is established by the majority of nodes. If more than half the nodes collectively decide to tell a lie, the lie becomes the truth, and there is nothing the rest of the nodes can do about it. The threat of a 51% attack becomes only more potent, as major mining pools gain more computing power. According to blockchain.com, the four biggest mining pools have 60.3% of bitcoin’s total hashrate (as of July 2018). If they decided to join together, they could make a big mess and bring down the biggest cryptocurrency there is.

Consensus

Bitcoin, as well as many other cryptocurrencies, use the Proof-of-Work consensus. This means that their nodes have to expend a lot of electricity during mining. This raises big ecological concerns as there has to be a lot of coal burnt to serve the blockchain industry. Some blockchain projects are now coming up with new environment-friendly consensus algorithms, such as Proof-of-Stake, Proof-of-Capacity, Proof-of-Authority, etc. Ethereum recently has made a big step in this direction by adopting Casper, a hybridized Proof-of-Work, and Proof-of-Stake consensus protocol.

BTC

3,992 USD
0.10%

ETH

136.00 USD
-0.53%

ZEC

57.39 USD
-1.09%

XMR

51.04 USD
0.08%

Related news

Is Ethereum Really ‘A Thing of the Past’ As Tron’s Justin Sun Claims?

The co-founders of Ethereum and Tron have recently engaged in a battle of wits on Twitter. In a recent interview, Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum had commented on the competition between Ethereum and Tron. He claimed that he would “lose hope in humanity” if Tron usurps Ethereum. Justin Sun came with a witty response on Twitter satirically praising Ethereum while at the same time diplomatically placing it to a veteran status; a thing from the past. Recently, a Chinese Institution also ranked Tron above Ethereum in its list of Public Blockchains. When #TRON succeed, we will build a monument in memory of #ethereum! @VitalikButerin will be remembered for his tremendous contribution in #blockchain industry! #TRX #BTT https://t.co/ig3Yg50NND — Justin Sun (@justinsuntron) March 24, 2019 Ethereum vs Tron: let’s Look At the Facts Ethereum, released in 2015 is the pioneering Dapps Platform currently placed second w.r.t total market capitalization. Tron Foundation was initiated in 2017 on the Ethereum platform itself. However, it is far more capable can Ethereum in terms of scalability and has also implemented Proof of Stake (PoS) on its Blockchain. Tron is currently ranked 11th w.r.t total market capitalization. Transactions per day Ethereum transactions per day chart The transactions on Tron are four times that conducted on Ethereum. Therefore, the usability of Tron is far greater than Ethereum. The number of transactions on Ethereum is primarily in the 500k-600k range. No. of transactions per day on Tron While the number of transactions executed on Tron per day is ranging in the 1.5 M to 2.2 M range, the volatility in the ‘number of transactions’ on Tron is considered significant. The transactions are ranging from 2.9 M to 1.5 M in fourteen days. The number of Dapps that follow TRC-20 protocol is increasing at a rate of one new Dapp every day. The race to the Top The Total Market Capitalization of Ethereum is almost $13 billion more than Tron. The total circulating supply of Tron is 66.68 billion, while the total quantity of Ether (ETH) tokens is 105.5 Million. Therefore, to overcome a difference of 13 billion dollars, Tron would have to gain ten times its current price while the price of Ethereum remains the same. The growth of Tron is exponential. Nevertheless, looking at the current statistic and development of Ethereum, Buterin’s Ethereum might have the upper hand on Tron in terms of price. However, the reward vs. risk ratio on Tron is comparatively less than Ethereum at current prices. Moreover, Tron leads in front of Ethereum in terms of technical prowess. Hence, only time will tell whether Justin Sun’s claims are really true. What are your views on which platform be the ultimate leader in Dapps and smart contract development?  The post Is Ethereum Really ‘A Thing of the Past’ As Tron’s Justin Sun Claims? appeared first on Coingape.
CoinGape

UPS Cuts Deal with Blockchain Company Inxeption

The post UPS Cuts Deal with Blockchain Company Inxeption written by Richard Kastelein appeared first on Blockchain News - Security and Utility Tokens, Tokenomics, Cryptoeconomics Setting up, selling and shipping products online will now be easier for UPS’s B2B clients thanks to a new alliance between UPS and e-commerce technology company Inxeption.   “The growth of e-commerce is driving B2B buyers to expect the same fast and convenient shopping experiences that consumers enjoy,” said Kevin Warren, chief marketing officer for UPS. […] The post UPS Cuts Deal with Blockchain Company Inxeption written by Richard Kastelein appeared first on Blockchain News - Security and Utility Tokens, Tokenomics, Cryptoeconomics
Blockchain News

Hot news

By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies. Read Privacy Policy to know more or withdraw your consent.