Successful Ethereum with Worthless ETH?

Successful Ethereum with Worthless ETH?

Jeremy Rubin, a technical advisor to Stellar and a Bitcoin Core contributor, explains how ETH the currency can become worthless, while Ethereum the platform prospers

In his article on TechCrunch, Rubin presents and rationalizes a possible future scenario where ethers as an asset have no market value whatsoever, despite Ethereum’s massive adoption.

Rubin first takes a look at Ethereum’s official description and underlines that it provides no value proposition for ETH. He goes to say that the value of ETH derives from the value of Ethereum only because users need to use ETH to pay for gas which powers smart contracts. Rubin then explains why economic abstraction, i.e. paying for gas in other assets, is a better approach.

Rubin clarifies that Ethereum can adopt a system where users can pay for gas in contract tokens, e.g. ERC-20 tokens. When one uses the ‘BuzzwordCoin’ contract, they simply transfer a necessary amount of BuzzwordCoins to the block’s miner as transaction fees. This relieves users from the need of converting tokens to ETH before interacting with the contract, and tokens do not depend on ETH’s market value.

Counterarguments to economic abstraction

There are four counterarguments to the economical abstraction of Ethereum:

  1. the lack of software support for economic abstraction
  2. difficulty in pricing many tokens
  3. the existence of contracts not tied to tokens;
  4. the need for ETH for Proof-of-Stake.

Software support

Opponents of economic abstraction claim that ‘the added complexity is not worth the ecosystem gains’. In response to this, Rubin argues that if the software does not meet the needs of its userbase, then it should be altered to do so.

Market pricing

To mine on economically abstracted Ethereum, miners simply need software which orders pending transactions based on available pricing information on corresponding tokens, which is already the case.

Non-token contracts

A user of a tokenless contract can pay in whatever asset they want. If a miner does not want those assets, the miner can process fees through a DEX and exchange the tokens for more preferred ones.


Stakeholders do not need to hold ETH to have voting power. The community can still establish consensus by using a variation of PoS dubbed Heterogeneous Deposit PoS by Rubin. In HD-PoS, each node determines the voting power of each asset, or a weight vector, and if all weight vectors are similar enough, consensus is possible. There is yet much research to be done in this area, Rubin adds, but if an HD-PoS algorithm proves impossible, this failure is only a shortcoming of Ethereum PoS specifically.

If all the applications and their transactions can run without ETH, there’s no reason for ETH to be valuable unless the miners enforce some sort of racket to require users to pay in ETH. But if miners are uncoordinated, mutually disinterested, and rational, they would prefer to be paid in assets of their own choosing rather than in something like ETH

Jeremy Rubin, tech adviser at Stellar, Bitcoin Core contributor


135.65 USD -0.82%
0.03402000 BTC -0.70%
Volume, 24h
1,041,928,069 USD
14,281,344,395 USD

Related news

4-Minute Ethereum Chart Analysis [March 2019]

Link to join Blockchain Education: [The Professional Crypto Trading & Investing Group] Follow me on Twitter for daily crypto updates: My personal choice for Charting/Technical Analysis Software: My preferred website hosting service [$4/month]: SAFE Binance Exchange Link [Best New Crypto Exchange]: $10 FREE Coinbase Link when you sign up: Ledger Nano S (where I store my BTC): Trezor Wallet (my first BTC backup): *Crypto Oracle is not a licensed crypto financial advisor. The information presented in this video is an opinion, and is not purported to be fact. Bitcoin is a volatile instrument and can move quickly in any direction. Crypto Oracle is not responsible for any trading loss incurred by following this advice
Crypto Oracle

Japan: SBI Holdings Announces Entry into Crypto Mining Chips Business

Japan-based financial services giant SBI Holdings on March 22, 2019, announced that it has established a new cryptocurrency mining sister company named SBI Mining Chip Co. Ltd. (SBIMC). The newly christened company will manufacture and develop crypto mining chips and mining equipment. Strong Leadership to Lead the Company In a bid to expand its footprintRead MoreRead More. The post by Aisshwarya Tiwari appeared first on BTCManager, Bitcoin, Blockchain & Cryptocurrency News
BTC Manager

Is Ripple (XRP) Crumbling? ETH Gap Widens to $1.5 Billion

Ripple prices down three percent from last week’s close Price surges depend on xRapid adoption Participation levels low and almost half that of Feb 24 At third with a market cap of $12,861 at the time of press, Ripple (XRP)—like the rest is under pressure. However, this has been compounded by regulatory uncertainty which is likely to be clarified next year. If the SEC has reason to classify XRP as a utility with no central control, prices will surge towards Sep 2018 highs at 80 cents. Ripple Price Analysis Fundamentals Ripple Inc promotes three of their central solutions to financial institutions and payment processors. Of the three, xCurrent is widely used. However, if XRP as an asset is to thrive, then banks must use the xRapid network. While offering the same end to end encryption, the solution uses XRP as a means of exchange. To facilitate transactions, Ripple Inc is working with different exchanges across corridors of their interest. There is and Bittrex between the US and the Philippines. At the same time, there is Bittrex and Bitso between the US and Mexico corridor of which Mercury FX is dominating. Even so, the lack of confirmation from regulators is forcing would be clients to postpone their plans allowing Stellar and IBM to narrow the gap. All the same, it is a good thing that IBM–with their history with banks, is demonstrating that despite blockchain being new; it can be efficient and cost saving. Candlestick Arrangement A month after dropping from 34 cents, Ripple (XRP) sellers are clearly in charge. It is down three percent from last week’s close and pretty stable from yesterday. Regardless, we are net bullish expecting higher highs in the next few days. However, all that is dependent on the reaction at 30 cents and how fast losses of Mar 21 are reversed—or confirmed. If the latter is the case and prices crumble below 30 cents, then bears of Feb 24 would cause a meltdown towards 25 cents canceling our stance. On the other hand, reversal effectively confirms gains of Jan 30. Technical Indicators Relative to Feb 24 bear bar—61 million versus 30 million averages, it’s evident that participation is shrinking. Today’s averages stand at 14 million which is less than half that of Feb 24. All the same and as per our previous emphasis, buyers would only be in charge if there is a spike of volumes above 17 million of Mar 21. That will jolt bulls back in track solidifying our stand. Chart courtesy of Trading View–BitFinex Is Ripple (XRP) Crumbling? ETH Gap Widens to $1.5 Billion was last modified: March 24th, 2019 by Dalmas NgetichThe post Is Ripple (XRP) Crumbling? ETH Gap Widens to $1.5 Billion appeared first on NewsBTC.

Hot news

By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies. Read Privacy Policy to know more or withdraw your consent.