Successful Ethereum with Worthless ETH?

Successful Ethereum with Worthless ETH?

Jeremy Rubin, a technical advisor to Stellar and a Bitcoin Core contributor, explains how ETH the currency can become worthless, while Ethereum the platform prospers

In his article on TechCrunch, Rubin presents and rationalizes a possible future scenario where ethers as an asset have no market value whatsoever, despite Ethereum’s massive adoption.

Rubin first takes a look at Ethereum’s official description and underlines that it provides no value proposition for ETH. He goes to say that the value of ETH derives from the value of Ethereum only because users need to use ETH to pay for gas which powers smart contracts. Rubin then explains why economic abstraction, i.e. paying for gas in other assets, is a better approach.

Rubin clarifies that Ethereum can adopt a system where users can pay for gas in contract tokens, e.g. ERC-20 tokens. When one uses the ‘BuzzwordCoin’ contract, they simply transfer a necessary amount of BuzzwordCoins to the block’s miner as transaction fees. This relieves users from the need of converting tokens to ETH before interacting with the contract, and tokens do not depend on ETH’s market value.

Counterarguments to economic abstraction

There are four counterarguments to the economical abstraction of Ethereum:

  1. the lack of software support for economic abstraction
  2. difficulty in pricing many tokens
  3. the existence of contracts not tied to tokens;
  4. the need for ETH for Proof-of-Stake.

Software support

Opponents of economic abstraction claim that ‘the added complexity is not worth the ecosystem gains’. In response to this, Rubin argues that if the software does not meet the needs of its userbase, then it should be altered to do so.

Market pricing

To mine on economically abstracted Ethereum, miners simply need software which orders pending transactions based on available pricing information on corresponding tokens, which is already the case.

Non-token contracts

A user of a tokenless contract can pay in whatever asset they want. If a miner does not want those assets, the miner can process fees through a DEX and exchange the tokens for more preferred ones.

Proof-of-Stake

Stakeholders do not need to hold ETH to have voting power. The community can still establish consensus by using a variation of PoS dubbed Heterogeneous Deposit PoS by Rubin. In HD-PoS, each node determines the voting power of each asset, or a weight vector, and if all weight vectors are similar enough, consensus is possible. There is yet much research to be done in this area, Rubin adds, but if an HD-PoS algorithm proves impossible, this failure is only a shortcoming of Ethereum PoS specifically.

If all the applications and their transactions can run without ETH, there’s no reason for ETH to be valuable unless the miners enforce some sort of racket to require users to pay in ETH. But if miners are uncoordinated, mutually disinterested, and rational, they would prefer to be paid in assets of their own choosing rather than in something like ETH

Jeremy Rubin, tech adviser at Stellar, Bitcoin Core contributor

Ethereum

ETH
Price
123.19 USD 0.34%
0.03358000 BTC -0.44%
Volume, 24h
775,496,956 USD
-11.98%
Marketcap
12,868,470,659 USD
10%
Emission

Related news

New Obelisk GRN1 Launches as a New Generation Grin ASIC Mining System via Cuckatoo31 Algorithms

Obelisk, a manufacturer of ASIC mining hardware, launched a next-generation mining system called The Obelisk GRN1. The intention is to target the Cickatoo31 Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm. The new chip includes new improvements to the hashing boards, control boards, mechanical design and also enhancements to the PSU. The information was released by the company on January 17 in a blog post. The team behind Grin decided to start developing ASICs for the Cuckatoo31+ algorithms on Grin. At the same time, it has provided code that defines a specification for the Cuckatoo31+ algorithms. According to the press release, hardware development faces serious challenges in terms of flexibility. Modifying a product can result in several months of delays. Now, the Grin team has given Obelisk all the required confidence to move forward with development and commit to a final design. The company has decided to create the most competitive miner possible with a large number of very large chips. In this way, they will be packing as much density as possible into the machines. According to the company the GRN1 is expected to have 10,000 mm2 of silicon, and because of this, its price will be higher. Obelisk explains that they will be making a two-phase sale of the new GRN1 miners. The first one will be related to a voucher sale in which the company will be selling $3,000 vouchers that can be convertible into 1 Cuckatoo31 mining unit. The sale starts today January 17th and it will last until February 1st. There are 10,000 vouchers available. There will be a second phase that is a full machine sell that will be going live in March. The price of the units will be $6,000 each. Voucher holders will have the possibility to exchange their vouchers for hardware devices without any additional cost. Obelisk informs that if there are clients that do not feel comfortable purchasing the Cuckatoo31 miner, the firm will be issuing a refund of $2,000. However, there are only two weeks for voucher holders to claim a refund. The firm has also explained what they will be doing with the funds received from selling mining equipment. Obelisk wrote about it: “During the first phase, we will be setting aside $100 per voucher sold to fund Grin development. During the second phase, we will be setting aside $500 per new unit sold for Grin development. The majority of the money collected for Grin development will be used to fund no-strings-attached stipends for independent developers. The remaining money will be set aside to fund high-priority endeavours such as security audits.” Obelisk said that they are not comfortable providing technical specifications. They explained that they have not finalized the chip or completed the final verification and layout stages of design. Nevertheless, they expect that the unit will be performing at least 100 graphs per second and consume no more than 800 watts. This can be compared with the NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti. It performs less than 2 graphs per second and it also consumes 250 watts. The company is working in order to protect Grin against 51% and censorship attacks. This is very important for the community after all the attacks experienced by other projects in the market.
Bitcoin Exchange Guide

Hot news

By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies. Read Privacy Policy to know more or withdraw your consent.