The Difference between Permissionless and Permissioned Blockchains

Classification of blockchains by groups, the detailed explanations of permissionless (public) and permissioned (private) blockchains and the ways of their application in business

Finrazor readers have already got familiar with the role of the blockchain and its areas of application, now the time has come to learn about the difference between permissionless and permissioned blockchain models. This article will help our readers to understand key distinctions and clarify the purpose of different types of blockchains.

The first ever blockchain has found its use in Bitcoin. As time passed, people thoroughly studied it and created their own. Now if your business needs a shared database, you can have yourself your own blockchain customized to fit your precise needs.

Blockchains can be classified in two groups: permissionless (open, public) and permissioned (private). Though there are some in the middle, those that combine their features in unique ways to meet specific requirements of a project, such as Chicago’s Cook County’s blockchain-based property title transfer system.

Permissionless blockchains

Permissionless blockchains, as their name suggests, do not require users to have permissions to interact with the system. Bitcoin, as the most common example, is free for anyone to join and participate. If you have a computer with an online access, you can become a bitcoin user at once: you can send and receive bitcoins, view the entire history of transactions, build blocks, get rewards, leave the network at any time, and join again. You can create and execute smart contracts if you are a node on Ethereum network, which is also a great example of an open blockchain. And nobody can forbid you to do any of that.

Public blockchains usually have an incentive for you to participate. In exchange for your computing power, the system gives you a chance to win some coins (cryptocurrency) by finding blocks for the blockchain. These coins are valuable even outside the system, and you can exchange it for real money. Or you can choose to wait (HODL) until they appreciate and more services and retailers start accepting them. This kind of incentive proves to be a major factor in the success of cryptocurrencies, as their predecessors failed to come up with a relevant incentivizing model.

Permissionless blockchains are mainly used by customer-to-customer (C2C) or business-to-customer (B2C) companies due to their decentralized, transparent design. This, however, entails certain limitations. Scalability of public blockchains is often talked about as the main stumbling block of open blockchains. Hopefully, it is only a matter of time until public blockchains can catch up and even outperform server-client databases and private blockchains.

Permissioned blockchains

Permissioned blockchains, as you may have already guessed, do require certain authorization for a node to read the data and write new records. Private blockchains can be very different, as they are utilized in many areas of business. Some blockchains need you to pass a verification to become a fully authorized node, others may allow you to join and will restrict your actions depending on your specific functions in the system. Ripple, a system of global transactions used primarily by banks, is the first example that comes to mind when speaking about permissioned distributed ledger. Though you can hold Ripple tokens (XRP), the system runs on a group of validating nodes, and you cannot simply join the network.

If two or more companies need a universal source of truth, a shared database, they can use a private blockchain. A private blockchain can be created from scratch, or you can use a blockchain platform, such as Multichain, Corda, and Hyperledger Fabric, and configure it as a private blockchain. Entries in these blockchains will be added only if the node has proper authorization. This is why permissioned blockchains are mostly used in business-to-business (B2B) relationships. For example, Walmart uses a blockchain-based supply chain system to trace its pork from sources in China.

Private blockchains do not face scaling issues because they do not rely on individuals to run it. Businesses can set up powerful nodes that will maintain the blockchain and ensure its smooth performance.

Permissionless blockchains usually do not have an internal incentivizing scheme, as they are most commonly used only as systems of record and databases. Private blockchains do not have a built-in reward system for nodes because they do not need to encourage people to join the network.

Though terms private and permissionless blockchains were used interchangeably in this article, people now believe there are certain distinctions between the two. For example, participation in private blockchains is by invitation only, whereas permissioned blockchains can accept new nodes after a process of verification or authorization.


8,744 USD -5.52%
Volume, 24h
3,497,717,274 USD
153,922,072,217 USD

Related news

Bitcoin Price at $10,000 is in Danger As Bulls Begin to Lose Support

Bitcoin has been struggling to regain the bullish momentum its enjoyed for the bulk of 2019. Ever since December 2018 when Bitcoin price bottomed, it has mostly been on an upward ascent until it met former bear market resistance at $13,800 and it resulted in a nasty rejection and flash crash that put the entire parabolic rally on ice. Today, Bitcoin price dipped below $10,000 after bull lost daily and weekly support at around $10,185 but paused briefly at $9,800 before falling any lower. Will Bitcoin bull reclaim $10,185 and make an attempt higher? Or will $9,800 break and see a restest of lows around $9,200, and possibly even lower in the coming days ahead? Bitcoin Price Struggles to Maintain Support at $10,000, Bulls Losing Strength to Bears Bitcoin bulls have been not only breathing a sigh of relief now that Bitcoin is once again in the five-digit territory – a far cry away from its bear market lows around $3,000, that put real panic in the hearts of crypto traders and investors who feared the worst was ahead. But Bitcoin bounced, and it brought the first-ever crypto-asset well above $10,000 to $13,800 where it was rejected by former bear market resistance and has struggled ever since to make another attempt at breaking above it. Now, Bitcoin is struggling to even maintain $10,000, the important resistance that was supposed to act as a FOMO trigger taking the crypto asset to new highs. It did incite some FOMO, but not enough to get Bitcoin to revisit its previous all-time high of $20,000 it set back in December 2017. Will Bulls or Bears With the Battle for BTC and Its Short Term Trend Future Most are in the long-term extremely bullish on Bitcoin. Many expect the crypto asset to eventually reach prices of $100,000 to as much as a million per BTC. But irrational exuberance also permeates throughout the crypto industry, and crypto enthusiasts often let their imagination and speculation get the best of them. Clearly, Bitcoin is at an impasse in terms of trading, and whichever direction is finally chosen could set the trend for the short- and medium-term. $BTC looks to be creating lower-highs and lower-lows on the daily chart Marked are the open and support areas based on the weekly chart with previous support possibly flipping to resistance If confirmed, watching the next weekly support at $8975 as a potential target — Josh Rager (@Josh_Rager) July 23, 2019 If Bitcoin were to break below $10,000 with strength, taking out $9900 and $9800, a retest of where it bounced in recent days at $9,200 would be retested, as well as potential weekly support at just under $9,000. If Bitcoin can reclaim weekly support turned resistance at $10,200, it could make a run toward $10,500 or higher, where the weekly candle opened on Sunday night. A break above that could have Bitcoin trying for $11,000 or retrying to incite a bull run above where the major rejection happened. Related Reading | Regulatory Pressure Amidst Libra Crypto Controversy Hasn’t Shaken BTC Bulls  These are critical times for crypto, and while that’s commonly said in the past, the latest regulatory pressure has changed the market dynamics and could create an environment for real fear and panic in the coming days, which would surely have a strong effect on Bitcoin price. Featured image from Shutterstock Bitcoin Price at $10,000 is in Danger As Bulls Begin to Lose Support was last modified: July 23rd, 2019 by Tony SpilotroThe post Bitcoin Price at $10,000 is in Danger As Bulls Begin to Lose Support appeared first on NewsBTC.

Willy Woo Discusses the Greatest Threat to ‘Bitcoin’s Dream’

Popular crypto-analyst Willy Woo wonders if institutional investment will negatively impact Bitcoin price action.  Willy Woo Wonders… On Tuesday, Adaptive Capital partner and crypto-analyst, Willy Woo, tweeted out a thought that has long been on the minds of many Bitcoin investors. In the semi-stream of consciousness that followed, Woo suggested that the primary reason for the commodity’s sh*tcoin like trading behavior is due to it existing in “a controlled market with a few hands holding a concentrated supply.” While Bitcoin has proven to have an unshakeable network and zombie-like price action that always comes back to please, there is one major vulnerability that could negatively impact Bitcoin price action. According to Woo, this risk to the “Bitcoin dream” is the possibility of coins becoming concentrated into a few hands which will function as “the new bankers”  This is a common theory bandied about throughout crypto-circles and there are a number of people who worry that institutional investment will lead centralization and a dampening of BTC’s price volatility. Many investors are actually drawn to Bitcoin’s volatility and believe that this is part of the ‘magic’ of investing in the digital currency. If it’s price action began to mirror Gold its possible that some investors would lose interest and many would simply hodl Bitcoin as a store of value. Is Bitcoin a Store of Value or a Medium of Exchange? Earlier this year, Diar Research published a report showing that all throughout 2018 institutions were steadily accumulating Bitcoin; especially during November 2018 when the digital asset crashed to a yearly low. Given that Bitcoin’s coin supply is limited to 21 million and that many retail investors hold on to their coins, large-scale accumulation by institutions could present challenges.  Woo ponders “what kind of monetary policy would be sensible to encourage distribution [and concludes] that the 49 year  Jubilee Cycle of debt forgiveness in Babylonian times looks pretty smart.” While cryptic, Woo’s mention of the Jubilee Cycle refers to the conclusion of seven cycles of Sabbatical years and its significant impact on the management and ownership of land in Biblical times. During the Jubilee, slaves and prisoners were supposed to be freed, and all debts were forgiven. Bitcoinist intends to contact Woo for further elaboration on the relevance of this reference.  The Twitter community appeared deeply interested in Woo’s musings and a number of followers engaged with thought-provoking responses. Popular crypto-analyst Dave the Wave suggested that market cycles encourage increased distribution, whereas @less_is_a_lot suggested that solution is a “deflationary currency that can actually work as a medium of exchange.” According to @less_is_a_lot, Bitcoin is nothing more than a complex speculative asset the wealthy use to “suck wealth” away from the dumb and greedy. Some respondents also suggested that it will take a clear fiscal policy where large Bitcoin holders are taxed at a variable rate dependent upon the size of their holdings. @davidegallo suggests that such a tax would “encourage the emission of BTC in the real economy and therefore circulation and distribution.”  Ultimately, Woo presents a fantastic question which will continue to gain relevance as institutional investors deepen their involvement with the crypto-sector.  Do you think institutional investment will dampen Bitcoin’s price action? Share your thoughts in the comments below!  Image via Shutterstock, Twitter@Less_is_a_lot, @Woonomic, @Davethewave The post Willy Woo Discusses the Greatest Threat to ‘Bitcoin’s Dream’ appeared first on

Blockchain Voting via Voatz Launches in Utah County for August’s Municipal Primary Election

Utah County is the third jurisdiction to adopt blockchain technology for their voting processes. The first two states to add blockchain voting to select areas were Colorado and West Virginia. Blockchain technology has many benefits, as industries around the world have come to find. Some jurisdictions in the United States have already implemented the technology […]
Bitcoin Exchange Guide

Hot news

By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies. Read Privacy Policy to know more or withdraw your consent.