Views Differed: Irregularities in ICO stats

Views Differed: Irregularities in ICO stats

Recently, three agencies, namely ICORating, Token Data, and CoinSchedule, revealed the ICO stats for November — and their data varies greatly. Let’s compare their methods

Data on the funds raised by ICOs in November shows unpromising results on a global basis. Many analytical firms and agencies are making their reports, however, figures provided by ICORating ($268 mln), Token Data ($65 mln) and CoinSchedule ($353 mln) are the closest to the truth. According to the data provided by each of the three agencies, the minimum of funds raised this year is set in November.

The difference in the provided data and figures is significant, that is why we decided to refer to the mentioned agencies to get the information on their methods of gathering statistics for ICO projects. By the time of publication, we received an answer only from ICORating analytics who shared with us their strategy for collecting data.

How do you store the projects’ data?

All the data provided on the ICORating website is stored in the internal database. Unfortunately, at the moment direct access to the database is not available, but we accept requests by e-mail and review them individually: info@icorating.com

How do you count the number of ICOs a month?

The number of ICOs is counted on a monthly basis as follows: we aggregate data from open sources, thus adding the information that junior analysts could not find, and then separately count the number of ended ICOs as the total number of projects for the past month and the number of successful projects for the month. A successful ICO is a project that got more than $0.5 million within the crowdsale and did not return the investment.

How do you search for ICOs?

We collect information on new ICOs from open sources:

  • listing platforms,
  • aggregators of investment rounds,
  • specific news resources,
  • conferences,
  • and investor communities.

How do you track wallet balances, in part, embrace different wallets with different currencies?

Currently, we do not aggregate data on the wallet balances due to the fact that projects often either leave the crowdsale final wallet address closed, or use several addresses to collect funds, and can also use escrow services, which also make access to the reliable data complicated. Therefore, we collect data on the funds raised from open sources: project’s social media channels, official statements, verified news sources. At the same time, we realize that in this case there is a risk to face dishonesty from the project team.

Do you take into account private sales?

If the project had only private sales, there was no public sale round and it is not planned, then we would not take private sales into account when calculating descriptive statistics on the ICO market. These funds are calculated in a separate database.

How do you evaluate a project’s revenue if it is a long-term one, like with the EOS-case?

We can say that there are few projects like this, therefore, we consider such cases individually.

During the ICO of EOS, we calculated ROI based on the data from the first round of ICO which ended in the summer of 2017. At the moment, we calculate ROI based on the data of the final round which ended in the spring of 2018. In general, we calculate ROI of the project at the end of ICO.

How we estimate funds of the projects that have crowdsale in several stages: we summarize funds for all periods of the project crowd sales and then use this amount when analyzing the project.

Would you make it a bit clearer as for how you keep track of such statistics: every month or once when the fundraising process is fully completed?

We calculate ROI of the project at the end of ICO. In addition, as part of market analysis reports, we also calculate ROI at the time of three days after the token listing on the exchange. To read our analytical reports, follow the link: https://icorating.com/reports/quarterly/

Data on the project funds are collected when the project is completed; and when we have access to the information on the number of attracted investments.

Do you take into account unsuccessful ICOs (say, an ICO planned to raise 40 mln, but raised only 800k)?

We collect data on all ICOs on the market, including funds raised and announced hardcaps. Therefore, we include unsuccessful ICOs in our statistics, with a methodological reference to the study as a warning. An unsuccessful ICO is a project that raised less than $0.5 mln via crowdsale and an ICO which has returned investments.

We would be happy to get comments from Token Data and CoinSchedule representatives in order to complete the article!

Related news

The ICORating Agency gives the Basic Review of the Faireum Project.

Faireum is a public blockchain which aims to provide infrastructure for online blockchain gambling and gaming solutions The following information about the project is available from public sources PROJECT BRIEF Name Faireum Ticker FAIRC Project type Infrastructure ICO BRIEF Pre sale start date March 25th 2019 Pre sale end date April 24th 2019 Public sale start date June 1st 2019 Public sale end date June 30th 2019 Token type ERC20 Token usability Utility Total token supply 1 200 000 000 Token supply for sale 600 000 000 Percentage of tokens for sale 50 Soft cap USD 2 500 000 Hard cap USD 25 000 000 Token price 1 FAIRC USD 0 05 Bonuses Yes Lock ups Yes Currencies accepted ETH BTC LTC EOS Min Max contribution USD 10 USD 100 000 KYC Yes Additional emission No Registration country Singapore Restricted list United States of America USA and China TEAM ADVISORS Team members 21 Key member executives Ishinara Yoshihiko Evan Dai Shore Jixing Jin Advisors 4 Partners 42
ICORating

The ICORating Agency rates the mHealthCoin project at Risky+.

We rate MyDFS as Stable The MyDFS project is a blockchain daily fantasy sports platform and also a mobile application The emphasis is on the mobility of the platform and its convenience for users This positioning for the platform is not a random one the MyDFS team already has experience developing fantasy sports applications Inspired by its past success and a major upcoming event in the sports world the FIFA 2018 World Cup the MyDFS team led by Viktor Mangazeev decided to apply its experience in the blockchain segment of fantasy sports Anyway the team gives the impression of being professionals able to realize what they have conceived MyDFS has beautifully designed documentation The official WP is detailed enough as well a rare combination Separately we note the financial model and scenario modeling which clearly indicates the application of best practices for the ICO market We are very impressed by the marketing undertaken for the forthcoming token Currently support for the project on social media is impressive their number of subscribers is more than impressive and discussions on Telegram and Bitcointalk indicate significant interest in the project from the community This state of affairs is very positive for a project whose success depends heavily on marketing The main risk for the project is competition Interest from the crypto community in fantasy sports has been present for a long time and currently there is no fundamental uniqueness in MyDFS The strong point is the timing of the roadmap it is expected that full functionality will be provided by the summer of 2018 To summarize MyDFS gives the impression of being a strong interesting project The team demonstrates an organized and mature approach in entering the competitive fantasy sports market Even without a revolutionary component the platform remains promising in the context of the attractiveness and convenience of the service for end users Therefore in competition with other blockchain based solutions MyDFS stands out primarily due to its pragmatic business approach
ICORating

The ICORating Agency rates the mHealthCoin project at Risky+.

We rate MyDFS as Stable The MyDFS project is a blockchain daily fantasy sports platform and also a mobile application The emphasis is on the mobility of the platform and its convenience for users This positioning for the platform is not a random one the MyDFS team already has experience developing fantasy sports applications Inspired by its past success and a major upcoming event in the sports world the FIFA 2018 World Cup the MyDFS team led by Viktor Mangazeev decided to apply its experience in the blockchain segment of fantasy sports Anyway the team gives the impression of being professionals able to realize what they have conceived MyDFS has beautifully designed documentation The official WP is detailed enough as well a rare combination Separately we note the financial model and scenario modeling which clearly indicates the application of best practices for the ICO market We are very impressed by the marketing undertaken for the forthcoming token Currently support for the project on social media is impressive their number of subscribers is more than impressive and discussions on Telegram and Bitcointalk indicate significant interest in the project from the community This state of affairs is very positive for a project whose success depends heavily on marketing The main risk for the project is competition Interest from the crypto community in fantasy sports has been present for a long time and currently there is no fundamental uniqueness in MyDFS The strong point is the timing of the roadmap it is expected that full functionality will be provided by the summer of 2018 To summarize MyDFS gives the impression of being a strong interesting project The team demonstrates an organized and mature approach in entering the competitive fantasy sports market Even without a revolutionary component the platform remains promising in the context of the attractiveness and convenience of the service for end users Therefore in competition with other blockchain based solutions MyDFS stands out primarily due to its pragmatic business approach
ICORating

Hot news

By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies. Read Privacy Policy to know more or withdraw your consent.