What the US SEC’s Actions Mean for Exchanges

What the US SEC’s Actions Mean for Exchanges

The SEC recently released a stream of rulings versus ICOs such as AirFox and Paragon, but, the regulatory body’s actions on exchanges have a more substantial, short-term effect which could drive new investments to the asset class

On 19 November, news of the settlements between the SEC and ICOs CarrierEQ (AirFox) and Paragon circulated. In a public statement released by the SEC, the said ICOs are culpable for failing to register their token issues as securities, rather than fraudulent activities.

According to CoinDesk’s Institutional Crypto newsletter, SEC actions like this are not only about ICOs but also about, and to a greater extent, exchanges.

SEC Statement and Settlement with the exchange EtherDelta

On 9 November came the SEC’s first enforcement effort against an exchange. The agency implicated EtherDelta for infringing securities laws by neglecting to register the exchange. A settlement where EtherDelta founder Zachary Coburn agreed to pay fines, interests, and penalties was reached.

With the statement regarding this case, the SEC defined what is deemed an exchange and what conditions call for an exchange to register.

Last month, the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) in New York released the results of its fact-finding investigation on cryptocurrency exchanges. The result suggested that crypto-trading platforms pose an added risk to investors by functioning as the venue for trading and, at the same time, acts as a broker-dealer.

The newsletter quoted from the OAG result which states that exchanges have not registered with the SEC:

Virtual asset trading platforms now in operation have not registered under state or federal securities or commodities law

And this statement, according to the newsletter, indicated what was to come to exchanges.

Both governmental agencies, the SEC and OAG, are set to protect investors.

Advancement of Digital Assets

In closing, the newsletter states that the process of registering exchanges will disrupt current business models. The added paperwork and compliance requirements will also add costs for trading platforms.

But more robust infrastructure may result from this oversight that can go hand-in-hand with governmental regulators. This may bring clarity and new investments to the asset class.

SEC Actions in the Crypto Industry

The SEC suspended SIMEX Inc. from making false claims, suspended two investment products offered by a CoinShares subsidiary, and it is still awaiting the right BTC ETF proposal.

BTC

3,444 USD
-0.08%

ETH

90.75 USD
0.92%

Related news

Bitcoin SV Under Pressure Despite Growing Support Base

Bitcoin SV was the worst-performing cryptocurrency in the top-ten on Thursday. The coin that previously demonstrated inverse price action with the rest of its peers now finds itself struggling to regain momentum despite signs of early adoption across the market. BSV Update Over the last 24 hours, the BSV price has fallen an average of […] The post Bitcoin SV Under Pressure Despite Growing Support Base appeared first on Hacked: Hacking Finance.
Hacked

Ripple CTO compares Bitcoin [BTC], XRP security models; calls proof-of-work “adversarial system”

In a recent interview with Internet History Podcast, David Schwartz, the Chief Technology Officer of the leading blockchain firm, Ripple spoke about the mining scenario in the XRP ecosystem and compared it against that of Bitcoin [BTC]. Here, he stated that the initial idea, while developing the XRP ledger was to get rid of the proof-of-work mechanism that Bitcoin uses. Here, the CTO backed his statement by mentioning the issues that align with the protocol. Schwartz explained that XRP is not an adversarial system like the Bitcoin ledger. Furthermore, the BTC ecosystem pits miners against each other in a competition for a fixed pool of resources. This creates adversarial interests that make the security model of Bitcoin difficult, he said. In his words: “It’s not an adversarial system like the Bitcoin ledger is. if you’re mining and I’m mining, we’re competing for sort of a fixed pool of resources and that creates sort of adversarial interests that make the security model more difficult.” Subsequently, the blockchain mastermind also elaborated on the nature of the XRP ledger, addressing it as cooperative. He stated that all the members of the ecosystem are working together on advancement. He added: “[…] which means that if you’re going to improve the stability of the network, I want you to participate.  Because you’re not taking anything away from me and I think that can make a more secure model but it does mean that the system can’t sort of give out the digital asset.” He further stated that all the XRP that will ever exist was created in the genesis ledger in June 2012, when the system was built. Regarding proof-of-work, he said that the mechanism has distributed the asset broadly but miners have high expenses wherein the costs of ASIC and power have to be taken into consideration. In his opinion, the money is sucked out of the ecosystem as the miners start selling due to high costs of mining. Lastly, the Ripple official mentioned that the XRP ledger leaves out one inherent feature of predictable market supply, which is fulfilled via Ripple-created escrow accounts. The post Ripple CTO compares Bitcoin [BTC], XRP security models; calls proof-of-work “adversarial system” appeared first on AMBCrypto.
AMBCrypto

Hot news

By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies. Read Privacy Policy to know more or withdraw your consent.