What's the difference?

What's the difference?

In the spotlight of this week: Brian Stutland compared BTC to VIX, China and South Korea call for lift on ICO ban and XRP rebranding.

Brian Stutland of Equity Armor Investments gave an interview to CNBC about the correlation between the world’s most prominent digital currency and the wider, non-crypto market

He compared Bitcoin to VIX, the Volatility Index on CBOE, and said that there's a correlation between them.

Of course, you can always find some similarities between two assets, especially when both are in treding down. What is the purpose of VIX? It acts as a fear gauge for the whole market. Its value represents the expected annualized change in the S&P 500 over the next 30 days, calculated with options-market data. As we see, it only reflects the current market sentiment. Last time it tripled in price in February, when the Dow plunged more than 1,000 points. Traders feared that the rising inflation might cause cheap money to be pulled out of the economy. Now it has returned to fairly comfortable levels, as everyone seems to calm down.

Bitcoin always acts on its own. It never reacts to any news related to real economies. Gold is usually considered a defensive asset. Sometimes, it rises when the geopolitical situation in the world becomes tense, and sometimes it doesn't. But the history of Bitcoin trading is too short to make such loud statements. Maybe it'll become a defensive asset when every trader gets the access to buying it on major non-crypto exchanges. Thus, comparing VIX and Bitcoin isn't correct.

Simultaneously with China, the National Assembly of South Korea has plans to lift the ban on ICOs it introduced in 2017

Also, the Korean committee asked the government to set up a special task force to put in order the crypto trading and increase its transparency.

As we see, being a closed country in an open world won't do you any good. Since imposing the ban, Korea is losing talented young people who are forced to move to a new country where they can continue to run their blockchain-related businesses. Many Korean blockchain startups have moved to Singapore, Switzerland, Thailand or Japan, where they are always welcomed. In the new environment, where people can migrate with ease and there are no limits to new technologies, there's no need for restrictions. Those countries, which adapt to ever-changing conditions, will lead the development. Technologies are the new resource of our century, and slowing down their development is like selling your oil fields to another country in 20th century. As technologically advanced as South Korea is, it's pretty natural for them to encourage the development, not to strangle it.

Ripple is making a re-brand for XRP

During the recent Consensus 2018, a new logo was presented. Also, it was announced that Ripple wants to detach its brand from a Coinbase, thus a re-brand serves this purpose.

Quite a smart move by Ripple. While they're having troubles with authorities and, particularly, with US Congress, they want to make it seem like they don't have anything in common with XRP. For those who haven’t been paying attention to this company's progress, it has managed to partner up with many banks, all of which use xVia, their older product for cross-border payments that doesn't require using XRP as an intermediary asset. To this day, there's still no any use for that coin. Despite this it has a very high market capitalization, being in the top 5. Now the rumours are that Ripple wants XRP to be listed on Coinbase, but it's impossible in current conditions, given that Coinbase can't list coins and tokens that are considered a security. A move such as a rebranding could help. At least it seems that Ripple thinks so. But it's hard to believe that they are separate entities, given that there is still a ton of XRP frozen in company accounts.


3,987 USD


0.3069 USD

Related news

Santander Bank Gets Confused With XRP and Ripple

The recognized financial institution Santander announced on Twitter on March 23 that they are using XRP for international payments. Nonetheless, the bank confused Ripple with XRP. In another […] The post Santander Bank Gets Confused With XRP and Ripple appeared first on UseTheBitcoin.
Use The Bitcoin

Bitcoin Dominance Wanes In Crypto Recovery, But Researcher Says This Isn’t The Case

Recent reports seem to indicate that, believe it or not, Bitcoin (BTC)’s short-term prospects in this market are limited, as crypto analysts await the holy grail of trading sessions — the fabled “altseason.” With this phase of trading, analysts expect for Bitcoin’s hegemony over the broader industry to slip, as stakeholders flee to alternative digital assets in search of hefty profits. But a researcher claims that traders are getting this all wrong. Bitcoin Losing Steam To Other Crypto Assets? In recent weeks, cryptocurrencies, save for BTC, have posted stellar gains in and of themselves. Litecoin has rallied by 160% since its bottom in December, Cardano is up by 24% in the past weeks, and other assets are posting movements that resemble those seen in 2017’s rally. This price action, which has come seemingly straight out of left field, has depressed the Bitcoin market dominance reading, which has struggled ever since the parabolic rally seen over yesteryear. Sure, the reading has recovered from a 32% bottom to 50% where it stands now, but it’s a far cry from the 58% seen in late-2018. And some expect for this to continue, as they see much more value in blockchains not only known for being a store of value, like Bitcoin. Related Reading: Researcher: Bitcoin Will Easily Surpass Market Cap of Gold at $8 Trillion One trader going by the moniker “Galaxy” remarked that he wouldn’t be surprised Bitcoin’s share of the cryptocurrency space falls to under 30%, citing the weak dominance uptrend to claim that the impending altseason will relatively pummel BTC. No, Maybe Not JP Thor, a leading industry researcher & Bitcoin diehard, argued that no, CoinMarketCap and similar data aggregators are getting their readings all wrong (as normal), along with those commentators quipping that BTC is rapidly losing traction. In an extensive Medium post, titled “Bitcoin’s Market Dominance,” Thor remarked that the classical method of using market capitalization to weigh an asset’s dominance is flawed. I just published Bitcoin’s True Market Dominance https://t.co/Ikts82v19u — JP [ ₿] (@jpthor__) March 22, 2019 Thor remarks that if you take volume (liquidity) into account, which he did through aggregating 12 months of trading activity, Bitcoin is far from dead in the water. The researcher writes that Bitcoin’s dominance in the form of liquidity is actually well above the 50% gauged by market capitalization. In fact, Bitcoin has a consistent dominance reading of over 80%, which has only trended higher in this downturn. Ethereum, on the other hand, has a measly ~7%, while altcoins take up the rest of the proverbial pie.  And with that, it was concluded: “In fact, just taking into account the Top 5 coins, Bitcoin (the 20%) captures over 85% of the market… CoinMarketCap’s ‘Market Dominance’ is flawed since it does not factor in liquidity and the reported 55% is significantly understated.” Sentiment-wise, industry leaders seem to think that BTC will keep on this market for the rest of its lifespan. Phil Chen of HTC’s Exodus (crypto) division told NewsBTC that he thinks that Bitcoin is fundamentally the core of this industry, so it would thus be irrational to ignore it or cast it aside. Featured Image from Shutterstock Bitcoin Dominance Wanes In Crypto Recovery, But Researcher Says This Isn’t The Case was last modified: March 24th, 2019 by Nick ChongThe post Bitcoin Dominance Wanes In Crypto Recovery, But Researcher Says This Isn’t The Case appeared first on NewsBTC.

Bitcoin [BTC] success rate was “so tiny” in its early days compared to recent times, says ShapeShift CEO

Erik Voorhees, the CEO of ShapeShift and a well-known influencer, spoke about the cryptocurrency price bubble and the bear market, in an interview for WhatBitcoinDid. Voorhees stated that this was the fourth time he experienced the cryptocurrency bear market, adding that he has been in the space “pretty much” since the beginning. He further added that the bear market “gets bigger” and “more intense” compared to the previous one as the numbers and the impact are bigger. “[…] the first bubble I was in, early mid 2011, was bigger in terms of percentage gain but the industry was small back then, the people talked in terms of hundreds of thousands of dollars not multi-billion dollars. This is a big industry at this point and when this whole industry rises by a 100x in 2017 and then collapses back down by 90x, it has a big effect” Voorhees went on to state that he was the “least worried” about recovering from the 2017 bubble because the industry has made “so much progress,” which has resulted in the evolution of better technology. He said: “[…] I don’t know if markets will get crazy again in a month or in two years but they will get crazy again and so we sit here and we build and we get ready for that […] I mean, you have to understand the perspective I come from like back in 2011, we imagined some day maybe in our fantasies that this industry would be what it is today” He then went on to state that likelihood of Bitcoin becoming successful was “so tiny” during its initial days, in comparison to recent times. “[…] we are not mainstream yet but we are we are getting there and most people in the world those people in at least in the Western world in modern society are familiar with Bitcoin they’ve heard of it it’s not the strange alien thing anymore.” The post Bitcoin [BTC] success rate was “so tiny” in its early days compared to recent times, says ShapeShift CEO appeared first on AMBCrypto.

Hot news

By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies. Read Privacy Policy to know more or withdraw your consent.